 gratifiant Future Physics: Variable Speed of Light, Invariable Wavelength

 Pentcho Valev (10/04/2019, 10h45)
The formula

(frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength)

implies that, if the speed of light is invariable, as Einstein postulated in 1905,

any frequency shift entails a wavelength shift.

The implication is obviously false, which means that Einstein's 1905 postulate is false as well:

"Thus, the moving observer sees a wave possessing the same wavelength [...]but a different frequency [...] to that seen by the stationary observer."

"By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, oncemore, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiveris somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, the distances between subsequent pulses are not affected, but still there is a frequency shift."

"Let's say you, the observer, now move toward the source with velocity Vo. You encounter more waves per unit time than you did before. Relative to you, the waves travel at a higher speed: V' = V+Vo. The frequency of the waves you detect is higher, and is given by: f' = V'/λ = (V+Vo)/λ."

"Vo is the velocity of an observer moving towards the source. This velocityis independent of the motion of the source. Hence, the velocity of waves relative to the observer is c + Vo. [...] The motion of an observer does notalter the wavelength. The increase in frequency is a result of the observer encountering more wavelengths in a given time."

The fundamental axiom of today's physics

"The speed of light is invariable"

is false, even nonsensical. In future physics, it will be replaced with thecorrect axiom

"The wavelength of light is invariable".

See more here:

Pentcho Valev
 Pentcho Valev (10/04/2019, 23h13)
Physics wrongly teaches that the wavelength of light, just like the wavelength of sound, VARIES with the speed of the emitter:

This variation of the wavelength of light contradicts the principle of relativity. Officially admitting, one day, that the wavelength of light DOES NOT VARY with the speed of the emitter will trigger a sweeping paradigm shift- nothing will remain of today's fundamental physics.

Pentcho Valev
 Pentcho Valev (11/04/2019, 09h22)
The lie that the wavelength of light VARIES with the speed of the emitter is actually a fundamental fudge factor in post-truth physics - it camouflages the otherwise obvious falsehood of Einstein's constant-speed-of-light postulate:

Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When thesource emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary."

This variation of the wavelength of light contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied, by measuring it, Zoe (the emitter) would know how fast she is moving, without any reference to outside objects:

The wavelength does not vary with Zoe's speed - accordingly Jasper (the receiver) measures the speed of light to be c'=c+v, not c. The truth is Newtonian, not Einsteinian:

Conclusion: The speed of light is VARIABLE; the wavelength of light is INVARIABLE.

The last statement will one day become the fundamental axiom of physics. Here are five important conclusions validly deducible from it:

Premise 1: The wavelength of light is invariable.

Premise 2: The formula (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength) is correct.

Conclusion 1: Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a speed-of-light shift.

Conclusion 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v.

Conclusion 3: Spacetime is an absurdity. Gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist - LIGO conspirators fake them.

Conclusion 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies - near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation - Einstein's general relativity is nonsense.

Conclusion 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is STATIC, not expanding.

Pentcho Valev