


Observer (receiver) starts moving towards the light source:
The frequency and the speed of the light pulses, as measured by the moving observer, VARY PROPORTIONALLY; the wavelength (or distance between the pulses) is INVARIABLE. This observation, generalized over all possible scenarios, will become The Fundamental Law of future (Einsteinfree) physics. Here is a deduction from The Fundamental Axioms: Axiom 1: The wavelength of light is invariable. Axiom 2: (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength) Conclusion (The Fundamental Law): Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speedoflight shift. See more here: Pentcho Valev 


Five important conclusions validly deducible from The Fundamental Axioms ofnew (Einsteinfree) physics:
Axiom 1 (new): The wavelength of light is invariable. Axiom 2 (borrowed from old physics): (frequency) = (speed of light)/(wavelength) Conclusion 1 (The Fundamental Law): Any frequency shift entails (is caused by) a proportional speedoflight shift. Conclusion 2: If the emitter and the observer (receiver) travel towards each other with relative speed v, the speed of light as measured by the observer is c' = c+v. Conclusion 3: Spacetime and gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime) don't exist. LIGO's "discoveries" are fakes. Conclusion 4: Light falls in a gravitational field with the same acceleration as ordinary falling bodies  near Earth's surface the accelerations of falling photons is g = 9.8 m/s^2. Accordingly, there is no gravitational time dilation  Einstein's general relativity is nonsense. Conclusion 5: The Hubble redshift is due to light slowing down as it travels through vacuum. The universe is not expanding. Pentcho Valev 


Einstein's constantspeedoflight postulate is OBVIOUSLY false. Physicistssee that and even try to tell the truth sometimes but there is a problem. Fundamental physics is entirely based on the false constancy and will collapse without it. In that regard telling the truth is suicidal:
Joao Magueijo, Faster Than the Speed of Light, p. 250: "Lee [Smolin] and I discussed these paradoxes at great length for many months, starting in January 2001. We would meet in cafés in South Kensington or Holland Park to mull over the problem. THE ROOT OF ALL THE EVIL was clearly SPECIAL RELATIVITY. All these paradoxes resulted from well known effects such as length contraction, time dilation, or E=mc^2, all basic predictions of special relativity. And all denied the possibility of establishing a welldefined border, common to all observers, capable of containing new quantum gravitational effects." "...Dr. Magueijo said. "We need to drop a postulate, perhaps the constancy of the speed of light." "The speaker Joao Magueijo, is a Reader in Theoretical Physics at Imperial College, London and author of Faster Than the Speed of Light: The Story of a Scientific Speculation. He opened by explaining how Einstein's theory of relativity is the foundation of every other theory in modern physics and that the assumption that the speed of light is constant is the foundation of that theory. Thus a constant speed of light is embedded in all of modern physics and to propose a varying speed of light (VSL) is worse than swearing!It is like proposing a language without vowels." "The whole of physics is predicated on the constancy of the speed of light," Joao Magueijo, a cosmologist at Imperial College London and pioneer of the theory of variable light speed, told Motherboard. "So we had to find waysto change the speed of light without wrecking the whole thing too much." What scientific idea is ready for retirement? Steve Giddings: "Spacetime. Physics has always been regarded as playing out on an underlying stage of space and time. Special relativity joined these into spacetime... [...] The apparent need to retire classical spacetime as a fundamental concept is profound..." Joao Magueijo, Niayesh Afshordi, Stephon Alexander: "So we have broken fundamentally this Lorentz invariance which equates space and time [...] It's the other postulate of relativity, that of constancy of c, that has to give way..." "We've known for decades that spacetime is doomed," says ArkaniHamed. "Weknow it is not there in the next version of physics." Pentcho Valev 


Einstein "borrowed" his constantspeedoflight falsehood from the theory of the NONEXISTENT ether:
Albert Einstein: "...I introduced the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light, which I borrowed from H. A. Lorentz's theory of the stationary luminiferous ether..." The constantspeedoflight falsehood goes hand in hand with the variablewavelengthoflight falsehood: Stephen Hawking, "A Brief History of Time", Chapter 3: "Now imagine a source of light at a constant distance from us, such as a star, emitting waves of light at a constant wavelength. Obviously the wavelength of the waves we receive will be the same as the wavelength at which they are emitted (the gravitational field of the galaxy will not be large enough to have a significant effect). Suppose now that the source starts moving toward us. When thesource emits the next wave crest it will be nearer to us, so the distance between wave crests will be smaller than when the star was stationary." This variation of the wavelength of light contradicts the principle of relativity. If the wavelength varied with the speed of the emitter, by measuring it inside his spaceship, the emitter would know how fast he is moving without looking outside. The wavelength of light, unlike the wavelength of sound, does not vary withthe speed of the emitter. Accordingly, the observer (receiver) measures the speed of light to be c'=cÂ±v. The truth is Newtonian, not Einsteinian: "Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining theresults of the Michelsonâ€“Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The namemost often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c Â± v)." The proposition "The wavelength of light is invariable", generalized over all possible scenarios, will become the fundamental axiom of future, Einsteinfree physics. I have developed the idea in a series of tweets here: Pentcho Valev 